Template talk:Scientology.html

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Template:Scientology page.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming
Archives: 1

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.

Scientology portal

This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology.
The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics.
See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.

Template

This article has been rated as Template-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

people organization

It seems the "People" section is really a "Proponents" section. If we keep it like that, that's how it should be renamed (rename it to "Proponents"). If it stays "People" (in the template), all "People" should go there. --Rob (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps a change to "Leadership", or "Prominent Scientologists" ? Cirt (talk) 21:49, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

"Leadership" sounds good, but then there's the question of where to put non-Leaders, who are still prominent. --Rob (talk) 23:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Maybe call that section "Leadership and prominent Scientologists" ? Cirt (talk) 15:03, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

For the time being I think a change to just "Leadership" is appropriate. Cirt (talk) 18:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

I think that was a good change. Perhaps we can make one or two more sections for people (and visually group them together). I think we could create a "Critics" section, taking people out of "Controversies", which is cluttered and overly broad (what or what is not a "controversy" in Scientology?). A "Followers" section might be good for non-leadership Scientologists, as well. --Rob (talk) 19:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Hrm, that might be getting to unwieldy, but we could always try it and see how it looks, and go back if warranted. Cirt (talk) 19:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)